The Evolution of Canada’s Tibet Policy

Until 1969, Canadian support for the Tibetan government was often tentative, but steady. Early correspondence between Canadian diplomats in Peking and New Delhi and their counterparts in Ottawa describes Tibet as an independent state incapable of resisting the military invasion by Chinese forces.

In 1950, Canada’s Minister of External Affairs Lester Pearson, sent a confidential memo to his Ambassador in Washington. In the memo, Pearson was clear:

“In fact it appears that during the past 40 years Tibet has controlled its own internal and external affairs. Viewing the situation thus, I am of the opinion that Tibet is, from the point of view of international law, qualified for recognition as an independent state”.

By March 1959, as the Lhasa Uprising raged resulting in the deaths of some 10,000 Tibetans, internal Government of Canada documents show that officials were following developments closely and reporting to Ottawa. They attributed the uprising to growing frustration in Tibet over China’s “invasion in 1950”. By June 1959, however, Canadian diplomats were already suggesting that China be admitted to the United Nations and that efforts to assist Tibetan refugees be done quietly and without public fanfare.

By 1970, the international climate had changed and Canada officially recognized the People’s Republic of China. With the establishment of diplomatic relations Canada recognized China’s effective control over the Tibetan territory. In a letter written to the Canada Tibet Committee in July 1988, the Honourable Joe Clark explained:

“… the Canadian Government’s view is that Tibet’s legal status is that of an autonomous region of the People’s Republic of China, as set out in the Chinese constitution.”

Following the November 1990 visit of the Dalai Lama to Ottawa when he inaugurated the Human Rights Monument near Parliament Hill, gave testimony before the Standing Committee on External Relations, and introduced his Five Point Peace Plan to Canadians, Canada’s official position on Tibet’s political status was amended to reflect a more nuanced and principled approach:

“In 1970, when Canada established diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China, it recognized the PRC as the sole legitimate government of China. Canada takes no position with regard to specific Chinese territorial claims; it neither challenges nor endorses them.”

The position was Canadian policy until 1997 when Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Lloyd Axworthy, adopted a new foreign policy approach he termed “principled pragmatism”. The pragmatic dimension of principle required another change of Canada’s official position on Tibet’s status in 1998:

“When Canada established diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China in 1970, we recognized the PRC as the sole legitimate government of China. Canada does not recognize the Tibetan “government-in-exile” led by the Dalai Lama based in Dharamsala, India.”

Since 1998, Canada’s position has remained essentially unchanged, although with some adjustment presumably because of the Dalai Lama’s devolution of power in 2011. In 2013, Canada’s position on Tibet’s status is:

“Canada recognizes the People’s Republic of China as the sole, legitimate government of China and does not recognize the Tibetan “government-in-exile”. Canada recognizes the Dalai Lama as an important spiritual leader who earned the Nobel Peace Prize and is an honorary Canadian citizen.”

Chronology of Canada-Tibet Relations